Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
    
Advanced search   
 


 
   Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38-43  

The surgical management of the rheumatoid spine: Has the evolution of surgical intervention changed outcomes?


1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Great Western Hospital, Swindon; Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
2 Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
3 Norwich Medical School, Norwich, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication24-Jun-2014

Correspondence Address:
Robin Bhatia
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Great Western Hospital, Swindon
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.135221

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Context: Surgery for the rheumatoid cervical spine has been shown to stabilize the unstable spine; arrest/improve the progression of neurological deficit, help neck pain, and possibly decelerate the degenerative disease process. Operative intervention for the rheumatoid spine has significantly changed over the last 30 years. Aims: The purpose of this study was to review all cases of cervical rheumatoid spine requiring surgical intervention in a single unit over the last 30 years. Materials and Methods: A prospectively-maintained spine database was retrospectively searched for all cases of rheumatoid spine, leading to a review of indications, imaging, Ranawat and Myelopathy Disability Index measures, surgical morbidity, and survival curve analysis. Results: A total of 224 cases were identified between 1981 and 2011. Dividing the data into three time-epochs, there has been a significant increase in the ratio of segment-saving Goel-Harms C1-C2: Occipitocervical fixation (OCF) surgery and survival has increased between 1981 and 2011 from 30% to 51%. Patients undergoing C1-C2 fixation were comparatively less myelopathic and in a better Ranawat class preoperatively, but postoperative outcome measures were well-preserved with favorable mortality rates over mean 39.6 months of follow-up. However, 11% of cases required OCF at mean 28 months post-C1-C2 fixation, largely due to instrumentation failure (80%). Conclusion: We present the largest series of surgically managed rheumatoid spines, revealing comparative data on OCF and C1-C2 fixation. Although survival has improved over the last 30 years, there have been changes in medical, surgical and perioperative management over that period of time too confounding the interpretation; however, the analysis presented suggests that rheumatoid patients presenting early in the disease process may benefit from C1 to C2 fixation, albeit with a proportion requiring OCF at a later time.

Keywords: Atlantoaxial subluxation, basilar invagination, C1-C2 fixation, occipitocervical fixation, rheumatoid cervical spine


How to cite this article:
Bhatia R, Haliasos N, Vergara P, Anderson C, Casey A. The surgical management of the rheumatoid spine: Has the evolution of surgical intervention changed outcomes?. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2014;5:38-43

How to cite this URL:
Bhatia R, Haliasos N, Vergara P, Anderson C, Casey A. The surgical management of the rheumatoid spine: Has the evolution of surgical intervention changed outcomes?. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 16];5:38-43. Available from: http://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2014/5/1/38/135221


   Introduction Top


Rheumatoid arthritis commonly affects the cervical spine, and if left untreated, can result in progressive debilitating neurological morbidity and increased mortality. [1],[2],[3],[4],[5] There are several, overlapping pathological processes occurring in the cervical spine of the symptomatic rheumatoid patient. These include: atlanto-axial (horizontal) subluxation, pannus-related stenosis, subaxial instability/stenosis, and vertical translocation otherwise referred to as basilar invagination. [2],[6] To what extent does one pathological process exacerbate or result in another? There is some evidence to suggest that untreated atlanto-axial subluxation can lead to vertical translocation and brainstem compression. [2],[7],[8],[9] The corollary of this is that early fixation of C1-C2 may reduce the incidence of late-onset vertical translocation, although definitive evidence for this is lacking at present. There is evidence that early C1-C2 fixation can improve pannus-related stenosis whilst sparing the atlanto-occipital segment; [10],[11],[12],[13] however, this may be offset by the potential for exacerbation of subaxial instability. [14],[15],[16] Furthermore, there is the school of thought that C1-C2 fusion merely delays the inevitable and definitive operation of occipitocervical fixation (OCF). Two camps have thus arisen: The "segment sparers" and "occipitocervical fusionists".

How has the evolution of instrumented craniocervical surgery reflected out understanding of the natural history/pathophysiology of rheumatoid disease? Broadly, we may define three interventions in the surgical management of rheumatoid spine disease at the craniocervical junction: C1-C2 fixation, which had its origins in the original Gallie [17] and Brooks [18] type fusion, superseded by transarticular C1-C2 fixation, [19] and later the Goel-Harms C1-C2 fixation; [20] OCF: Using onlay graft, sublaminar wire/loop fixation [21] and rigid OCF; [22],[23] and the transoral anterior odontoid decompression popularized by Casey and Crockard. [24],[25]

In previous publications from this group, we have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of C1-C2 fixation [26] and rigid OCF [23] for the treatment of various rheumatoid and nonrheumatoid cervical pathologies. It is the purpose of this study to review, in totality, the entire surgical output for instrumented rheumatoid cervical spine management in a single unit over the last 30 years. There are three major questions we would wish to address:

1. How have trends in instrumentation changed over that time period?

2. How have changes in surgical intervention influenced functional improvements and mortality rates associated with rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine?

3. What proportion of patients undergoing (early) C1-C2 fixation require OCF at a later date?


   Materials and methods Top


This was a retrospective review of three prospectively-maintained databases of posterior instrumented cervical spine surgery for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in a single unit, spanning from 1982 to 2012. The operative procedures comprised: Ransford loop/sublaminar wire OCF, rigid (lateral mass/pedicle screw and occipital plate) OCF, and C1-C2 fixation (transarticular screw fixation and Goel-Harms posterior fusion). We did not include noninstrumented, or Brookes-Gallie wire, craniocervical fusions since these procedures largely comprised the preceding era and data collection was not sufficiently reliable before 1982.

This study was carried out at a tertiary referral center for spinal surgery; the operating surgeons were all consultant/attending neurosurgeons, assisted by spinal fellows from both neurosurgical and orthopedic backgrounds.

Baseline patient demographics included age, sex, radiology, pre-operative Ranawat grade, and Myelopathy Disability Index (MDI).

Operative procedures were categorized as above. C1-C2 fixation was subcategorized into transarticular screw insertion as originally described by Magerl, [19] or Goel posterior C1-C2 fusion: [20] A review of the operative steps for these two procedures has been described in a previous publication by Vergara et al. [26] Ransford loop/sublaminar wire OCF has been described by Moskovich et al. [21] The operative technique for rigid OCF has been described by Bhatia et al. [23]

It was not possible to accurately define when patients developed rheumatoid arthritis, and insufficient data were retrievable to determine when in the disease process cervical symptoms developed; however, baseline preoperative MDI allowed comparisons to be made between operative cohorts.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were administered methotrexate from 2000 onwards, which was continued into the perioperative period. Disease-modifying antirheumatoid drugs (DMARDs) such as Infliximab were discontinued 4 weeks prior to surgery and recommenced at a similar period after.

The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Mortality rates were updated for all patients in 2012 by accessing the National Health Service (NHS) portal to births and deaths; patients were thereby categorized as alive, dead or lost in 2012. The secondary outcome measures were the MDI as described by Casey et al., [27] and Ranawat grade [28] at 12 months postoperatively as a measure of change in functional status. This was obtained either by written questionnaire submitted at the time of the outpatient appointment, or by telephone questionnaire conducted by the spinal nurse specialist. For those patients undergoing C1-C2 fixation, the presence of neck pain in the presenting symptomology, and whether this had improved/deteriorated or remained static at 12 months follow-up was also recorded.

Perioperative (defined as within 30 days) surgical complications including mortality were recorded. Instrumentation failure, or requirement for posterior cervical revision surgery, was recorded at any time in the postoperative period within the limit of follow-up.

Statistical analysis

In order to address the question of whether outcomes had changed over the given time period, we subanalyzed and compared survival curves for surgeries occurring between 1981 and 1990 (termed the "early era") and 2000 and 2010 (termed the "late era"). A statistical comparison was made using log-rank test. A similar comparison was made for change in MDI at 1-year compared to preoperative status between the early and late epochs, using paired Student's t-test analysis. For the rest of comparisons, Student's t-tests were used. In all statistical analysis a cut-off of P < 0.05 was deemed significant. The statistical software of SPSS 17.0 (IBM SPSS) and Sigmaplot 12.0 (IBM SPSS) and Excel 2010 (Microsoft) were used for processing and graphical representation.


   Results Top


We identified 224 rheumatoid patients who underwent instrumented posterior cervical/craniocervical spine surgery between 1981 and 2011. The overall mean age (±standard deviation) at the time of surgery was 61 (±11) years; the female:male proportion was 180:46 in the entire series. There were 42 cases of rigid OCF; 116 Ransford loop OCFs; 20 cases of Goel-Harms and 46 cases of Magerl transarticular C1-C2 fusion in this series. The mean length of follow-up for all patients was 42 ± 36 months. [Table 1] summarizes the basic demographic data for each type of surgical intervention and the preoperative and (1 year) postoperative Ranawat and MDI scores. The mean age of patients undergoing C1-C2 fixation (combining transarticular and Goel-Harms fusions) was 60 ± 12 years, and the mean age for OCF patients (combining Ransford loop and rigid OCF cases) was 62 ± 10y (P = 0.2, t-test). The mode level of inferior fixation for the OCF patients was C5.
Table 1: Demographic information, and preoperative and postoperative functional outcome measures for all patients undergoing surgical fi xation for rheumatoid cervical spine disease

Click here to view


[Figure 1] displays the trend in instrumentation over the 30 years period, directly comparing the proportion of occipitocervical to C1-C2 fusions; the use of mono-segmental C1-C2 surgery has steadily increased to surpass OCF in the present decade in the surgical management of the rheumatoid spine.
Figure 1: Bar chart depicting the trend in instrumented surgery in the management of rheumatoid craniocervical disease from 1980 to 2011. Occipitocervical fi xation has proportionately lost ground, and been superceded by C1-C2 fi xation as the primary operative procedure over the last 30 years

Click here to view


Survival curve analysis

Twenty-five patients were "lost" to data retrieval from the NHS portal for births and deaths in 2012. Of the remaining 199 patients, in the modern era (between 2000 and 2010) there is a 55% 10-year survival after posterior instrumented surgery for rheumatoid disease. This shows significant improvement compared to the earlier epoch of surgeries performed between 1981 and 1990 (P = 0.001, log-rank) [Figure 2]. Patients undergoing C1-C2 fixation have a significantly improved survival compared to those undergoing OCF (P = 0.01, log-rank) [Figure 3]. In order to adjust our comparison of the survival curves between the earlier and later epochs of surgery based on possible covariates, we fitted a Cox proportional hazards regression model. None of the covariates tested reached statistical significance; thus, we report in our graphs the unadjusted survival curves with log-rank comparisons.
Figure 2: Survival probability has signifi cantly improved in the modern era between 2000 and 2011 compared to the historical era between 1980 and 1990 for rheumatoid patients undergoing craniocervical surgery (P = 0.001, log-rank). This improvement is likely to be multifactorial

Click here to view
Figure 3: Patients undergoing C1-C2 fi xation have a signifi cantly improved overall survival compared to those undergoing occipitocervical fi xation (OCF) (OCF, both rigid and loop fi xation) (P = 0.01, log-rank)

Click here to view


Functional outcome data

Myelopathy Disability Index data was available for 190/224 (85%), and Ranawat scores for 176/224 (79%) patients at 1-year. There was a statistically significant difference in the baseline (preoperative) degree of myelopathy as measured by the MDI between patients undergoing C1-C2 fixation who had a mean MDI ± standard deviation of 28.7 ± 11.4% compared to OCF patients presenting with a mean MDI of 62.6 ± 15.4% (P = 0.001, t-test), as shown in [Figure 4]. However, both groups showed improved MDI at 1-year postoperatively [Table 1] (P = 0.001 for C1-C2 fusion, and P = 0.001 for occipitocervical fusion, paired samples t-test). The mode Ranawat preoperative score for all patients undergoing rheumatoid spine surgery was IIIa, compared to mode postoperative score at 1-year of II.
Figure 4: Patients undergoing occipitocervical fixation are significantly more impaired with a higher mean Myelopathy Disability Index at baseline compared those undergoing C1-C2 fi xation (P = 0.001). This may refl ect intervention earlier in the disease process for the latter procedure

Click here to view


Taken altogether, functional improvements as measured by preoperative and 1-year postoperative MDI have significantly increased comparing the modern (2000-2011) with historical (1980-1990) eras of surgical intervention (P = 0.019, t-test) [Figure 5].{Figure 4}

58/66 (88%) of patients who underwent C1-C2 fixation presented with neck pain (mixed axial neck pain and occipital neuralgia). 28/58 (48%) reported improvement in the neck pain at 1-year postoperatively.

Complications

Complications are listed in [Table 2]. Documentation of complication types varied over the 30-year period, resulting in some discrepancy in the reporting of respiratory and cardiovascular complications between the subgroups. In those undergoing C1-C2 fusion, there was a 9% instrumentation failure rate; five of the seven of the screw breakages were transarticular screws, resulting in a revision to OCF. All-in-all, 7/66 (11%) of patients undergoing C1-C2 fixation for rheumatoid disease required revision to OCF at a mean time of 28 months.
Table 2: Thirty days mortality and complication rates for all types of surgical intervention for cervical rheumatoid disease

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In 1987, Zoma and Hamblen wrote that it was difficult to define a clear strategy for the surgical management of symptomatic instability in the rheumatoid cervical spine because "the results of established procedures were unsatisfactory". [29] A year later, Heywood et al. posed three questions in relation to cervical instability in rheumatoid arthritis: [30]

  1. What are the indications for fusing an unstable rheumatoid cervical spine?
  2. When there is cord compression, is surgical decompression really necessary in addition to fusion?
  3. What should the morbidity and mortality figures be? 25 years later, are we any closer to answering these questions?


We present the largest series to date, and our data suggests that not only have the surgical procedures for the rheumatoid spine changed, but so too have the instrumentation and outcomes over the last 30 years. Consistent with the publication of new techniques for posterior cervical fixation, notably C1-C2 transarticular fixation (1987), and Goel-Harms fixation (1994 and 2001), our data reveals that OCF has gradually been superseded as the operative procedure of choice by C1-C2 fixation. Moreover, we have shown that the mean preoperative MDI is significantly lower in those undergoing C1-C2 fixation compared to OCF. This suggests that increasingly, we are operating on rheumatoid patients earlier in the disease process with segment-sparing C1-C2 surgery.

The mortality of rheumatoid patients undergoing cervical spine surgery has significantly improved over the last 30 years. Between 1980 and 1990, the 10-year survival rate was 35%, compared to 55% in the decade of 2000-2010 (P = 0.001, LogRank). Our Cox proportional hazards regression analysis failed to identify any covariates that would be influencing statistically the patients' survival. On the other hand, there are confounding factors such as the improvements of perioperative patient care and neuroanesthesia; and the effects of DMARDs as regards the optimization of preoperative general systemic status that we would not be able to test reliably within our dataset. However, this survival improvement could also reflect technological advances in instrumentation materials and techniques, as well as intervention earlier in the disease process. C1-C2 fixation rheumatoid patients were of an equivalent age to patients undergoing OCF at the time of operative intervention (P = 0.2, t-test), but survived longer on average compared to the latter.

Have there been similar improvements in functionality? This database was limited in some respects: MDI and Ranawat data were reliably collected in a prospective manner for all types of operation; however, we lacked data for a small proportion of patients at follow-up, and lacked sufficient data across the board on VAS or Neck Disability Index to report on neck pain. In the C1-C2 fixation group only, the database documented neck pain and change in this symptom at 1-year, revealing that the commonest presenting symptom in this patient category was neck pain (88%) rather than myelopathy.

A further weakness with this study was the variability of the length of the disease process prior to referral to the spinal unit and definitive surgical treatment. Over the course of the study time frame, referral patterns are likely to have changed, and this is reflected in the baseline MDI [Figure 4].

The trend toward operating earlier in the disease process may represent a mixture of earlier referrals to spine surgeons from rheumatologists (possibly secondary to the publications such as "Surgery on the rheumatoid cervical spine for the nonambulant myelopathic patient - too much, too late" in 1996 by Casey et al. [4] ); earlier detection of cranicervical pathology by the increasingly widespread use of various imaging modalities; as well as the development of operative techniques at the C1-C2 junction. Martel reported a 34% incidence of atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) in unselected patients attending the Arthritis Center; [31] and Sharp reported that 20% of patients in hospital with rheumatoid arthritis have AAS; [32] therefore, clearly a risk versus benefit analysis of intervention in the asymptomatic rheumatoid patient with AAS is required, and a watch-and-wait policy in this completely asymptomatic subgroup is reasonable.

In this series, we did not report on the fusion status in follow-up radiography. There are problems in the assessment of whether fusion has occurred after cervical instrumentation particularly with regards to the imaging modality of choice; whether fusion necessarily needs to be osseous or sufficiently fibro-osseous or even fibrous to prevent instrumentation failure; and the time point at which pseudoarthrosis can be determined to have occurred. Moskovich and Apostolides et al. described "stable fibrous unions" in a proportion of rheumatoid patients who did not progress to instability or instrumentation failure, but avoided the donor-site morbidity and the requirement for postoperative halo placement. [21],[33] In this series, we have 5/46 (11%) rate of transarticular screw breakage. This may be reflected in the trend in the unit toward Goel-Harms type fusions in the last decade, and the reasons for this high instrumentation failure may be related to the type of screw being inserted at that time and/or the efficacy of additional posterior C1-C2 wiring (Gallie-type fusion) in preventing sagittal plane movement. Nagaria et al. did not report instrumentation failure in their series of 37 rheumatoid patients undergoing C1-C2 transarticular fixation [34] without the addition of Gallie fusion; however, Gluf et al. have reported a screw fracture rate of 6.5% in their series of 191 patients (63 rheumatoids). In the latter publication, it was remarked that thicker-core screws had no breakages. [35]

We did not assess the incidence of subaxial instability after C1-C2 fixation as reported by Clarke et al.: 39% after C1-C2 interlaminar wiring, [15] and Ito and Mukai et al.: 18% and 24%, respectively after C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. [16],[36] Specifically, this may be related to the atlantoaxial kyphosis angle. [37] This is not necessarily a strong argument for OCF over C1-C2 fusion; however, since OCF, stopping too short of the thoracic spine according to Hirano et al., [38] can also result in significant subaxial disease progression. [22],[39]

A proportion of patients underwent transoral decompression at some point; but, we have found that we are performing this procedure less commonly compared to over 10 years ago. This might reflect the data presented herein showing intervention earlier in the disease process halting progression to the later stage of vertical translocation and/or pannus development; for example, Landi et al. have reported improvement of pannus and anterior cervical compression after posterior fixation. [11] Even intervention late in the disease process that is, Ranawat IIIB patients (subclassified into patients who can sit or who are bedridden) can make functional improvements despite increased complications as evidenced by Nannapaneni and Tanouchi et al. [40],[41]


   Conclusion Top


We have presented both historical and modern reviews of surgery in a single unit for rheumatoid spine disease, showing clear changes in the type of surgery, and stage of intervention. Moreover, we present improvements in mortality and functional outcomes over that time too, although causality underlying this is multifactorial.

 
   References Top

1.Dreyer SJ, Boden SD. Natural history of rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;366:98-106.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Fujiwara K, Fujimoto M, Owaki H, Kono J, Nakase T, Yonenobu K, et al. Cervical lesions related to the systemic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:2052-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Scott DL, Symmons DP, Coulton BL, Popert AJ. Long-term outcome of treating rheumatoid arthritis: Results after 20 years. Lancet 1987;1:1108-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Casey AT, Crockard HA, Bland JM, Stevens J, Moskovich R, Ransford AO. Surgery on the rheumatoid cervical spine for the non-ambulant myelopathic patient-too much, too late? Lancet 1996;347:1004-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Yoshida K, Hanyu T, Takahashi HE. Progression of rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine: Radiographic and clinical evaluation. J Orthop Sci 1999;4:399-406.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Oda T, Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Azuma B, Ochi T. Natural course of cervical spine lesions in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1128-35.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Bouchaud-Chabot A, Lioté F. Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. A review. Joint Bone Spine 2002;69:141-54.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Agarwal AK, Peppelman WC, Kraus DR, Pollock BH, Stolzer BL, Eisenbeis CH Jr, et al. Recurrence of cervical spine instability in rheumatoid arthritis following previous fusion: Can disease progression be prevented by early surgery? J Rheumatol 1992;19:1364-70.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Wolfs JF, Peul WC, Boers M, van Tulder MW, Brand R, van Houwelingen HJ, et al. Rationale and design of The Delphi Trial-I(RCT)2: International randomized clinical trial of rheumatoid craniocervical treatment, an intervention-prognostic trial comparing 'early' surgery with conservative treatment [ISRCTN65076841]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:14.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Grob D, Würsch R, Grauer W, Sturzenegger J, Dvorak J. Atlantoaxial fusion and retrodental pannus in rheumatoid arthritis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:1580-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Landi A, Marotta N, Morselli C, Marongiu A, Delfi ni R. Pannus regression after posterior decompression and occipito-cervical fixation in occipito-atlantoaxial instability due to rheumatoid arthritis: Case report and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:111-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Goel A, Sharma P. Craniovertebral realignment for basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. Neurol India 2004;52:338-41.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
13.Goel A, Dange N. Immediate postoperative regression of retroodontoid pannus after lateral mass reconstruction in a patient with rheumatoid disease of the craniovertebral junction. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;9:273-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Werle S, Ezzati A, ElSaghir H, Boehm H. Is inclusion of the occiput necessary in fusion for C1-2 instability in rheumatoid arthritis? J Neurosurg Spine 2013;18:50-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Clarke MJ, Cohen-Gadol AA, Ebersold MJ, Cabanela ME. Long-term incidence of subaxial cervical spine instability following cervical arthrodesis surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Surg Neurol 2006;66:136-40.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Ito H, Neo M, Sakamoto T, Fujibayashi S, Yoshitomi H, Nakamura T. Subaxial subluxation after atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation in rheumatoid patients. Eur Spine J 2009;18:869-76.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Gallie WE. Skeletal traction in the treatment of fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Ann Surg 1937;106:770-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:279-84.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Magerl FPS. Stable posterior fusion at the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. In: Kehr P, Weidner A, editors. Cervical Spine. Springer-Verlag (Jan 1987) ISBN-10: 0387819533; 1987. p. 322-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994;129:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Moskovich R, Crockard HA, Shott S, Ransford AO. Occipitocervical stabilization for myelopathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Implications of not bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:349-65.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Grob D, Schütz U, Plötz G. Occipitocervical fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;366:46-53.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Bhatia R, Desouza RM, Bull J, Casey AT. Rigid occipitocervical fixation: indications, outcomes, and complications in the modern era. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;18:333-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Casey AT, Crockard HA, Stevens J. Vertical translocation. Part II. Outcomes after surgical treatment of rheumatoid cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg 1997;87:863-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Crockard HA. Ventral approaches to the upper cervical spine. Orthopade 1991;20:140-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Vergara P, Bal JS, Hickman Casey AT, Crockard HA, Choi D. C1-C2 posterior fixation: are 4 screws better than 2? Neurosurgery 2012;71:86-95.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Casey AT, Bland JM, Crockard HA. Development of a functional scoring system for rheumatoid arthritis patients with cervical myelopathy. Ann Rheum Dis 1996;55:901-6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Ranawat CS, O'Leary P, Pellicci P, Tsairis P, Marchisello P, Dorr L. Cervical spine fusion in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:1003-10.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Zoma A, Sturrock RD, Fisher WD, Freeman PA, Hamblen DL. Surgical stabilisation of the rheumatoid cervical spine. A review of indications and results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987;69:8-12.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Heywood AW, Learmonth ID, Thomas M. Cervical spine instability in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:702-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Martel W, Page JW. Cervical vertebral erosions and subluxations in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 1960;3:546-56.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Sharp RJ. The cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24:401-2.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Apostolides PJ, Dickman CA, Golfi nos JG, Papadopoulos SM, Sonntag VK. Threaded steinmann pin fusion of the craniovertebral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1630-7.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Nagaria J, Kelleher MO, McEvoy L, Edwards R, Kamel MH, Bolger C. C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability due to rheumatoid arthritis: A seven-year analysis of outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2880-5.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Gluf WM, Schmidt MH, Apfelbaum RI. Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: A review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 191 adult patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:155-63.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Mukai Y, Hosono N, Sakaura H, Fujii R, Iwasaki M, Fuchiya T, et al. Sagittal alignment of the subaxial cervical spine after C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:436-41.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Yoshimoto H, Ito M, Abumi K, Kotani Y, Shono Y, Takada T, et al. A retrospective radiographic analysis of subaxial sagittal alignment after posterior C1-C2 fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Hirano K, Matsuyama Y, Sakai Y, Katayama Y, Imagama S, Ito Z, et al. Surgical complications and management of occipitothoracic fusion for cervical destructive lesions in RA patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:121-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Kraus DR, Peppelman WC, Agarwal AK, DeLeeuw HW, Donaldson WF 3rd. Incidence of subaxial subluxation in patients with generalized rheumatoid arthritis who have had previous occipital cervical fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:S486-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Nannapaneni R, Behari S, Todd NV. Surgical outcome in rheumatoid Ranawat Class IIIb myelopathy. Neurosurgery 2005;56:706-15.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Tanouchi T, Shimizu T, Fueki K, Ino M, Toda N, Tatara Y, et al. Neurological improvement and prognosis after occipito-thoracic fusion in patients with mutilating-type rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2506-11.  Back to cited text no. 41
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1699    
    Printed53    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal