Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
    
Advanced search   
 


 
   Table of Contents  
LETTERS TO EDITOR
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 82-83  

On the nature of facetal distraction spacers


Department of Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy

Date of Web Publication9-Feb-2017

Correspondence Address:
Laura Lippa
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte, 53100 Siena
Italy
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.199875

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Cacciola F, Lippa L. On the nature of facetal distraction spacers. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2017;8:82-3

How to cite this URL:
Cacciola F, Lippa L. On the nature of facetal distraction spacers. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 Mar 31];8:82-3. Available from: http://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2017/8/1/82/199875

Dear Sir,

We have all been following the birth and evolution of your philosophy of atlantoaxial intraarticular or facet spacers right from the beginning and seen it spread worldwide.[1] During this evolution not only its efficacy has been proven but the indication of the technique also extended to a point that transoral surgery will probably someday really become a memory of the past for every surgeon dealing with this pathology.

On reading your recent editorial “Atlantoaxial facetal distraction spacers: Indications and techniques”[2] we wanted to make a contribution to the discussion from our point of view as to the nature of the spacers inserted into the atlantoaxial articular cavity.

The distraction or “joint jamming” technique is in itself already a procedure that represents its very own technical peculiarities especially for the novice or “ first time user.” In 2013, we reported on our first case of facetal distraction in basilar invagination with a variation of the technique that we felt helped to make the approach easier for us.[3] We essentially distracted the exposed joints with a laminar spreader and introduced semi-cured bone cement into the cavities. Once cured the cement thus provided an excellent maintenance of distraction and the operation was completed with instrumentation and application of an autologous tricortical iliac crest graft between the occiput and C2 for fusion. In a subsequent case, we used an appropriately cut cylindrical titanium mesh cage filled with bone but noted at follow-up that this had subsided on one side even though not leading to any clinical problem. In yet another case, we used autologous iliac crest bone chips inserted into the joint cavities but unfortunately noted at postoperative control that the distraction was not as efficient as we had planned for. We had thus reverted to the initial bone cement technique for a following case with the same positive result.

We feel that the solution of bone cement is not only easy to perform but also efficient, with virtually no risk of subsidence and last but not least comes at a very low price which is a factor not indifferent in many parts of the world, becoming increasingly relevant also in “our neck of the woods.”

Finally, we felt that in our case with metal spacers, besides the subsidence, the distortion on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was a problem. Some authors recently published their experience with the insertion of commonly available subaxial anterior cervical fusion polyetheretherketone cages and this could probably be an ideal compromise where substantial distraction is required as the polymer has a low potential of subsidence, can be filled with bone graft, does not produce artifacts on MRI and comes generally at a reasonable price.[4]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Goel A. Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:281-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Goel A. Atlantoaxial facetal distraction spacers: Indications and techniques. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2016;7:127-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cacciola F, Patel V, Boszczyk B. Novel use of bone cement to aid atlanto-axial distraction in the treatment of basilar invagination: A case report and technical note. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:787-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Teixeira da Silva LE, de Barros AG, de Castro CJ, de Souza RT, Azevedo GB, Casado PL. Results of the use of PEEK cages in the treatment of basilar invagination by Goel Technique. coluna/columna 2016;15:61-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1397    
    Printed7    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal