Home | About JCVJS | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |   Login 
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Search Articles   
    
Advanced search   
 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size  Users Online: 339 


 
   Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 65-66  

Facet distraction spacers for treatment of degenerative disease of the spine: Rationale and an alternative hypothesis of spinal degeneration

Atul Goel
Department of Neurosurgery, King Edward VII Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, India

Date of Web Publication14-Mar-2011

Correspondence Address:
Atul Goel
Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.77669

Rights and Permissions
How to cite this article:
Goel A. Facet distraction spacers for treatment of degenerative disease of the spine: Rationale and an alternative hypothesis of spinal degeneration. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2010;1:65-6

How to cite this URL:
Goel A. Facet distraction spacers for treatment of degenerative disease of the spine: Rationale and an alternative hypothesis of spinal degeneration. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Jun 9];1:65-6. Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2010/1/2/65/77669

Degenerative diseases of the spine are common. The cervical and lumbar spine are more frequently affected and the dorsal spine is less commonly involved in the process. Degeneration of the disk or reduction in its 'water' content has been recognized as the principal initiating factor that starts off a cascade of secondary 'degenerative' effects on the spine. Numerous processes occur consecutively and the overall effect is reduction of the spinal canal and root canal dimensions, a phenomenon that is manifested by pain and symptoms of spinal cord, cauda equina, and spinal root compression. The disabling nature of the clinical symptoms leads the patient to a doctor.

The accepted concept of spinal degeneration is that reduction of the disk space height results in posterior buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and the 'periosteal reaction' thus initiates the formation of osteophytes. The osteophytes progressively increase in size resulting in an increasing indentation into the spinal canal. Simultaneous to the buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligaments, there occurs in-folding of the ligamentum flavum. Both these anterior and posterior indentations result in reduction of the spinal canal dimensions and ultimately cause symptoms of neural compression. The spinal degeneration is more common in the junctional zones of the spine at the C5-6 and C6-7 and the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. Simultaneous to the events that occur in the midline, there occur relatively less apparent, but probably more significant, effects of degeneration on the facet joints. The facets are relatively small in size and the overall movements that occur at these joints are less obvious and get overwhelmed by the imposing presence of the intervertebral disk, which corners the entire focus. Although difficult to evaluate and quantify, reduction of the facet joint space can be an early sign that signals the initiation of the process of degeneration. In the cervical and dorsal spine, the facets being more horizontally (transversely) and obliquely inclined, there occurs a phenomenon of retrolisthesis, wherein, the superior facet slips on to the inferior facet. In the lumbar spine, the facets being more vertically aligned, the articular capsule becomes lax due to vertical facetal override (superior facet slips inferiorly in relationship to the inferior facet) and the joint appears bulkier. Degenerative osteophytes can also form in the facets. The degenerative effects on the facets ultimately result in the reduction in height of the spinal root canal or the intervertebral neural foramina. The symptom of local back pain could also originate from the facet joints. The symptom of claudication pain may also be related to muscle fatigue on walking and resultant exacerbation of facetal override. The entire process of degeneration results in spinal and root canal stenosis. Degeneration can occur at a single or more than one segments of the spine. More often the process of degeneration is generalized and multiple segments and regions of the spine are involved simultaneously.

A number of theories and concepts of degeneration of the spine have been proposed and discussed over the last century. However, the basic premise of the hypothesis of origin of the disease process from the primary disk degeneration has been universally accepted and has not been questioned.

In the year 2006, we proposed an alternative method of treatment for spinal degeneration, which involved distraction of the facets and forced introduction of 'Goel facet spacers'. [1],[2] Although the technique of introduction of the spacers into the facet joint varied in the lumbar spine, when compared to the cervical and dorsal spines, the basic concept and principle of its action was similar. The process of facetal distraction resulted in a remarkable reversal of almost the entire gamut of changes in the degeneration of the spine. [3] The increase in the height of the facets resulted in an increase in the spinal canal dimensions and in the height and diameter of the intervertebral foramina. The interlaminar distance increased. The intervertebral body height increased in its entirety and there was restoration of height of the disk space. The disk water content also seemed to increase and get restored. The posterior buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament and the anterior bulge of the ligamentum flavum was simultaneously reduced. There was essentially a reversal of all the major known pathological events of spinal degeneration. Facetal instability could clearly be observed during surgery. Distraction of the facets by forced introduction of spacers resulted in restoration of the facetal height and fixation and alignment of the spinal segment.

Over a period of five years, approximately a hundred patients underwent treatment by facetal distraction in our department. Specially designed instruments were used for the purpose. Goel facetal spacers were made from Titanium metal. [The implants are proprietary items of General Surgical Company (GESCO India) Pvt. Ltd. and patent has been filed by Dr. Goel. The implants are not yet commercially available.] The spacers were in the form of a disk, the height of which ranged from 2.5 to 4 mm and the diameter was 8 to 12 mm. The spacer impactor was fixed over the base of the spacer by a screw-type joint. The spacer impactor assisted in impacting the spacer within the facet joint and also directed and controlled its traverse. The procedure of impaction was remarkably safe with regard to the nerve root, spinal cord, and vertebral artery. Essentially, decompression of the spinal canal and root canal was obtained without removal of any part of the bone, ligaments or disk. It was observed that such a treatment was relatively straightforward and easy to perform when compared to the other available methods. The technique resulted in an immediate postoperative relief of symptoms of spinal cord and root compression. Apart from the preoperative clinical and radiological guides, direct intraoperative observation of the status of the facets also guided the decision regarding the levels of the spine that needed treatment. Superior and inferior extension of the level of surgery was significantly easier. Bone graft pieces harvested from the iliac crest were then placed over the laminae, between the spinous processes, and over the treated facets, after appropriately preparing the host area. The procedure ultimately resulted in fusion of the spinal segment.

On the basis of our observations during the surgery that involved facetal distraction we present an alternative hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis and progress of spinal degeneration. It appears that spinal degeneration may not be initiated in the disk. Muscular laxity or weakness can lead to spinal instability that is manifested by facetal changes related to its incompetence. It appears that instability of the spinal segment may play a crucial role in the presenting clinical scenario and the observed radiological features. The entire phenomenon of spinal degeneration and resultant changes in the spine may be secondary to facetal incompetence. Such instability is rather easily observed on direct visualization of the joint during surgery, even when preoperative dynamic radiographs do not depict such an event. Reversal of all major known changes, generally associated with spinal degeneration, following a single process of insertion of distraction spacers within the joint, provides credence to this hypothesis.

Spinal instability as a result of laxity of muscles of the spine can lead to retrolisthesis of facets of the cervical and dorsal spine and facetal overriding of the lumbar spine. The associated changes with reduction of the disk space height, osteophyte formation, buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum into the spinal canal, and reduction of the spinal canal and root canal dimensions, may all be secondary phenomena. The fact that traction of the cervical and lumbar spines has formed the principal and successful form of non-surgical treatment over several decades provides support to the concept. The effectiveness of traction as a treatment method can be gauged by its lasting popularity and clinical success. Advocacy of physiotherapy and muscle exercises and consequent relief from symptoms also point in the same direction. Our preliminary observations suggest that distraction of the facets by manual implantation of metal spacers within the articular cavity results in sustained traction and fixation of the spinal segment, and provide an opportunity for local arthrodesis in a distracted position.

Although reduction of inter-facet space height has been discussed in the literature, it appears that this may be one important radiological guide that can determine the stability of the region. Decrease in height and retrolisthesis of the facets are indicators of instability and determine the need for distraction surgery. The oblique profile, relatively large size, firmness, and the biomechanical strength of the facets and of the pedicles can be used effectively and safely for distraction of the spinal segments and fixation. Distraction of the facets is done by surgically implanting specially designed spacers. Impaction of spacers in the facets results in several structural changes, all resulting in reversing the pathological effects of spondylosis.

 
   References Top

1.Goel A, Shah A. Facetal distraction as treatment for single and multi-level cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: A preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine 2011[In press]  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Goel A. Atlantoaxial joint jamming as a treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation: A preliminary report. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;7:90-4.   Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Goel A, Shah A, Gupta SR. Craniovertebral instability due to degenerative osteoarthritis of the atlantoaxial joints: Analysis of the management of 108 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2010;12:592-601.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  



This article has been cited by
1 Report of an eight-year experience with Camille’s transarticular technique of cervical spinal stabilization
Atul Goel, Chandrima Biswas, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Saswat Dandpat, Sagar Bhambere
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 2022; 95: 9
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Significance of Atlantoaxial and Subaxial Spinal Instability in Cervical Spinal Spondylosis: Commentary on “Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery”
Atul Goel
Neurospine. 2022; 19(4): 924
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Lumbar facet joint stabilization for symptomatic spinal degenerative disease: A systematic review of the literature
Sofia Musso, Felice Buscemi, Lapo Bonossi, ManikonPoulley Silven, Fabio Torregrossa, DomenicoGerardo Iacopino, Giovanni Grasso
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(4): 401
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Is evidence of bone “formation” and “fusion” in the spinal segment an evidence of segmental spinal instability?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(4): 365
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Retrospective evaluation of cervical fusion with DTRAX (R) cervical cage
Hamed Yazdanshenas, Ethan Osias, Richard Hwang, DonY Park, Elizabeth Lord, AryaN Shamie
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(1): 48
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Spinal cord injuries - Instability is the issue-stabilization is the treatment
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Artificial atlantoaxial and subaxial facetal joint - Proposal of models
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2022; 13(2): 107
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Clinical outcome following multisegmental cervical spinal fixation in patients who recovered partially following injury
Atul Goel, Aditya Lunawat, Abhidha Shah, Saswat Dandpat, Akshay Hawaldar, Hardik Darji, Nishit Trivedi
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2021; 12(3): 216
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Is disc herniation “secondary” to spinal instability? Is it a protective natural response?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2021; 12(3): 213
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Vertical spinal instability – Advanced neuromuscular therapy protocol
K. Ragurajaprakash
Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery. 2021; 25: 101165
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Outcome of Osteophytes After Only-Fixation as Treatment for Multilevel Cervical Spondylosis–A Minimum of 12 Months Follow-Up
Atul Goel, Tejas Vaja, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Saswat Dandpat, Ravikiran Vutha, Hardik Darji, Chandrima Biswas
World Neurosurgery. 2021; 146: e876
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Muscle Weakness–Related Spinal Instability Is the Cause of Cervical Spinal Degeneration and Spinal Stabilization Is the Treatment: An Experience with 215 Cases Surgically Treated over 7 Years
Atul Goel, Saswat Dandpat, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Ravikiran Vutha
World Neurosurgery. 2020; 140: 614
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Letter to the Editor. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Atul Goel
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2020; 32(4): 631
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Indicators of spinal instability in degenerative spinal disease
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(3): 155
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Lumbar facet distraction and fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term clinical outcome and reoperation rates
Giovanni Grasso, Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(4): 262
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Like anterior transoral decompression, will anterior cervical spine surgery find space in history books?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Adult idiopathic de novo lumbar scoliosis: Analysis of surgical treatment in 14 patients by “only fixation”
Atul Goel, Neha Jadhav, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Ravikiran Vutha, Saswat Dandpat, Arjun Dhar, Apurva Prasad
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(2): 124
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 When is inclusion of C2 vertebra in the fixation construct necessary in cases with multi-level spinal degeneration?
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2020; 11(4): 249
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Lumbar canal stenosis: analyzing the role of stabilization and the futility of decompression as treatment
Atul Goel, Shashi Ranjan, Abhidha Shah, Abhinandan Patil, Ravikiran Vutha
Neurosurgical Focus. 2019; 46(5): E7
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Camille's transarticular technique of spinal fixation: An underused surgical technique
Atul Goel
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2019; 10(4): 197
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Lumbar radiculopathy: Outcome analysis following treatment by only fixation – A report of an early experience of 44 cases
Atul Goel, Abhinandan Patil, Abhidha Shah, Survendra Rai, Ravikiran Vutha, Shashi Ranjan, Nilesh Bakale, Tejas Vaja
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2019; 10(4): 203
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Upregulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 ameliorates spinal degenerative disease in adolescents by mediating leptin and tumor necrosis factor-a levels
Xiao-Ming Tang, Jian Dai, Hai-Lang Sun
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Correlation between lumbar lordosis and the treatment of chronic low back pain with pulsed radiofrequency applied to the L2 dorsal root ganglion
Hsien-Ta Hsu, Shang-Jen Chang, Kuo-Feng Huang, Po-An Tai, Tin-Chou Li, Chun-Jen Huang
Formosan Journal of Surgery. 2017; 50(4): 125
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Letter to the Editor: Retro-odontoid mass
Atul Goel
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2017; 26(2): 269
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Letter: Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Atul Goel
Neurosurgery. 2017; 81(5): E64
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Letter to the Editor: Atlantoaxial instability and Chiari malformation
Andrei Fernandes Joaquim
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2015; 22(5): 559
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Resolution of Cystic Deterioration of the C1-2 Articulation with Posterior Fusion: Treatment Implications for Asymptomatic Patients
Atul Goel
World Neurosurgery. 2014; 81(1): e1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Letter to the Editor: Intraarticular spacers
Andrei Fernandes Joaquim
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2013; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Letter to the Editor: Intraarticular spacers
Tobias A. Mattei,Oscar J. Abdounur
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2013; : 2
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
30 Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area
Lee A. Tan,Carter S. Gerard,Paul A. Anderson,Vincent C. Traynelis
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2013; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
31 Distraction of facets with intraarticular spacers as treatment for lumbar canal stenosis: report on a preliminary experience with 21 cases
Atul Goel,Abhidha Shah,Madan Jadhav,Santhosh Nama
Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2011; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
32 æOnly fixationæ as rationale treatment for spinal canal stenosis
Goel, A.
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2011; 2(2): 55-56
[Pubmed]
33 Facet distraction-arthrodesis technique: Can it revolutionize spinal stabilization methods
Goel, A.
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine. 2011; 2(1): 1-2
[Pubmed]



 
Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5529    
    Printed367    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded125    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 33    

Recommend this journal
Sitemap | What's New | Feedback | Disclaimer | Privacy Notice  
© Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 20th July, 2009