|LETTER TO EDITOR
|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 103-104
Large ventral foramen magnum meningioma: Retrosigmoid suboccipital approach
Rajesh K Ghanta, Ameen Mohammad
Suraksha Hospital, Prajasakti Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
|Date of Web Publication||24-Aug-2012|
Rajesh K Ghanta
Suraksha Hospital, Prajasakti Nagar, Vijayawada - 520 010, Andhra Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Ghanta RK, Mohammad A. Large ventral foramen magnum meningioma: Retrosigmoid suboccipital approach. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2011;2:103-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Ghanta RK, Mohammad A. Large ventral foramen magnum meningioma: Retrosigmoid suboccipital approach. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 27];2:103-4. Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2011/2/2/103/100081
Foramen magnum meningiomas(FMMs) are rare tumors accounting for 1.8-3.2% of all meningiomas.  FMMs are challenging tumors because of their relation to medulla oblongata, lower cranial nerves and vertebral artery.
We report the case of a seventy-year-old female who presented with history of neck pain and weakness in all four limbs for three months. Neurological examintaion showed quadriparesis with grade 4/5 power, hypertonia and hyperreflexia. Two days before surgery, she devoloped urinary retention and was catheterized. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large ventral foramen magnum meningioma of size 3.5 × 2.8 × 3.2 cm severely compressing the brainstem [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Pre operative MRI showing large ventral foramen magnum meningioma severely compressing the brainstem|
Click here to view
Surgery was done in supine position with head turned to the left and fixed in sugita head frame. The tumor was approached by a linear incision of 9 cm, behind the mastoid process. Right retromastoid suboccipital craniectomy was done. Bone removal was done laterally till the sigmoid sinus was exposed and inferiorly including the foramen magnum. No resection of the occipital condyle was done. Dura was opened in cruiciate manner. Intraoperatively brainstem was severely stretched posteriorly by the tumor. Vertebral artery was seen adjacent to the base of the tumor. Tumor was soft to firm in consistency and intial debulking of the tumor was done.Total excision of the tumor was done(Simpson grade-2) with minimal handling of the brainstem as the tumor size provided great space for microsurgical removal. Post operatively, patient had transient lower cranial nerve palsy and mild left hemiparesis which recovered completely. Post operative MRI revealed complete excision of FMM [Figure 2]. Neurological examintaion at one year follow-up revealed power of 4+/5 on the left side and no cranial nerve deficits.
FMMs are difficult tumors to treat because of their location and vicinity of vital structures. FMMs are classified as posterior,lateral and ventral depending on their relation to the dentate ligament.  Various surgical approaches have been defined for approaching FMMs. , The goal is to achieve maximum tumor resection with minimum morbidity, by various approaches depending on the location and size of the tumor. Posterior FMMs are best approached by the posterior midline approach. Ventral and ventrolateral FMMs are approached by far lateral approach and the extreme lateral approach. Transoral approach has also been used for ventral FMMs. Conventional posterior suboccipital approach has also been used for anterior FMMs.  Far lateral approach, also called posterolateral approach or lateral suboccipital approach, is commonly used to resect ventral FMMs. , Condyle drilling varies from one third to one half of the condyle, in far lateral and extreme lateral approaches. Transcondylar approaches provide a significant greater area of exposure than the retrosigmoid approach. , Extent of removal of occipital condyle can be individualized according to the case. In some of the FMMs, removal of condyle might not be necessary. The present case did not require occipital condyle resection because the size of the tumor provided enough working space for tumor removal microsurgically by the retrosigmoid approach.
Retrosigmoid approach is well versed with most of the neurosurgeons as it is commonly done for approaching cerebellopontine lesions. The advantages of this approach are good visualization of tumor and cranial nerves as it provides a wide view of the posterior fossa. Posterior fossa vessels are also well visualized. The present case also illustrates that large ventral FMMs without spinal extension can be easily approached by conventional retrosigmoid suboccipital craniectomy without requiring partial condylectomy as the size of the tumor provides great surgical corridor for tumor removal.
| References|| |
|1.||Bruneau M, George B. Foramen magnum meningiomas: Detailed surgical approaches and technical aspects at Lariboisiere Hospital and review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 2008;31:19-33. |
|2.||Borba LA, de Olivera JG, Giudicissi-Filho M, Colli BO. Surgical management of foramen magnum meningiomas. Neurosurg Rev 2009;32:49-60. |
|3.||Goel A, Desai K, Muzumdar D. Surgery on anterior foramen magnum meningiomas using a conventional posterior suboccipital approach: A report on an experience with 17 cases. Neurosurgery 2001;49:102-6. |
|4.||Silva DO, Costa LF, Kitamura MA, Câmara Jr Dde A, Silva JC, de Azevedo Filho HR. Surgical treatment of ventral foramen magnum meningiomas. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2009;67:111-3. |
|5.||Suhardja A, Agur AM, Cusimano MD. Anatomical basis of approaches to foramen magnum and lower clival meningiomas: Comparison of retrosigmoid and transcondylar approaches. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14:e9. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]