|
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 7
| Issue : 2 | Page : 82-86 |
|
|
Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score
Rishi Anil Aggarwal, Sudhir Kumar Srivastava, Sunil Krishna Bhosale, Pradip Sharad Nemade
Department of Orthopaedics, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| Date of Web Publication | 5-May-2016 |
Correspondence Address:
Rishi Anil Aggarwal
Department of Orthopaedics, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0974-8237.181828
 Abstract | | |
Context: Preoperative severity of myelopathy, age, and duration of symptoms have been shown to be highly predictive of the outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM). The role of radiological parameters is still controversial. Aims: Define the prognostic factors in CCM and formulate a prognostic score to predict the outcome following surgery in CCM. Settings and Design: Retrospective. Materials and Methods: This study included 78 consecutive patients with CCM treated surgically. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale was used to quantify severity of myelopathy at admission and at 12-month follow-up. The outcome was defined as "good" if the patient had mJOA score ≥16 and "poor" if the score was <16. Age, sex, duration of symptoms, comorbidities, intrinsic hand muscle wasting (IHMW), diagnosis, surgical technique, Torg ratio, instability on dynamic radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity changes were assessed. Statistics: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 20.0) was used for statistical analysis. The association was assessed amongst variables using logistic regression analysis. Parameters having a statistically significant correlation with the outcome were included in formulating a prognostic score. Results: Severity of myelopathy, IHMW, age, duration, diabetes, and instability on radiographs were predictive of the outcome with a P value <0.01. Genders, diagnosis, surgical procedure, Torg ratio, and intensity changes on MRI were not significantly related to the outcome. A 8-point scoring system was devised incorporating the significant clinicoradiological parameters, and it was found that nearly all patients (97.82%) with a score below 5 had good outcome and all patients (100%) with a score above 5 had poor outcome. The outcome is difficult to predict with a score of 5. Conclusions: Clinical parameters are better predictors of the outcome as compared to radiological findings, following surgery in CCM. A simple scoring system based on clinicoradiological parameters is suggested in this paper to predict the outcome following surgery in cases of CCM. Keywords: Compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM), predictors of the outcome, score, surgical outcome
How to cite this article:
Aggarwal RA, Srivastava SK, Bhosale SK, Nemade PS. Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2016;7:82-6 |
How to cite this URL:
Aggarwal RA, Srivastava SK, Bhosale SK, Nemade PS. Prediction of surgical outcome in compressive cervical myelopathy: A novel clinicoradiological prognostic score. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2016 [cited 2023 Mar 21];7:82-6. Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2016/7/2/82/181828 |
| Introduction | |  |
Compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM) is a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction worldwide. It encompasses a wide variety of etiologies, the most common being spondylotic myelopathy. The other causes include disc herniation, congenital stenosis, PLL hypertrophy and ossification, ligamentum flavum thickening, and ossification. Emerging evidences suggest that patients improve after surgical decompression; however, the clinical and radiological parameters that predict the outcome are still uncertain. [1]
The aim of the study is to try and identify parameters, which may help in predicting the outcome after surgical decompression. Though it has been suggested that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the level of functional recovery, the evidence is not very strong. [2],[3],[4],[5] Moreover, as it has been seen with lumbar spine, the degree of cervical cord compression may not correlate with neurological status of the patients. We tried to evaluate preoperative clinical signs and symptoms of the patients and correlated them with the functional outcomes of the patient after surgery.
| Materials and methods | | |
A total of 78 patients with CCM who underwent surgery from Jan 2008 to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with CCM who were operated (decompression with/without instrumented fusion) in our institute were included. Only patients with a minimum 12-month follow-up were included in the study. CCM was defined as a constellation of symptoms (numb clumsy hand, gait impairment, paraesthesia, and bowel/bladder impairment) and signs (motor and sensory deficit, atrophy of hand intrinsics, hyperreflexia, Hoffman sign, upgoing plantar, lower limb spasticity, and broad/unsteady gait) supported by radiological findings. The patients with asymptomatic cord compression, pure radiculopathy, previous cervical spine surgery, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis were excluded from the study.
Preoperative assessment
- Demographic profile: Age, sex.
- Diagnosis: Spondylotic myelopathy/congenital stenosis/posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) hypertrophy and ossification/ligamentum flavum thickening and ossification.
- Comorbidities: Diabetes, hypothyroidism, etc.
- Duration of symptoms in months.
- Functional status: Calculated using Benzel's modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score.
- Bowel/bladder involvement: Yes or No.
- Radiological assessment.
- Torg-Pavlov ratio on lateral cervical spine x-ray.
- Instability on flexion and extension x-ray of cervical spine.
- Intensity changes on T2 weighted (T2W) MRI images: Hyperintense signal changes within the cord were noted by a spine surgeon and lead surgeon in all the cases (2 nd author).
Assessments at follow-up
The 12-month time frame was chosen because it represents a typical time period of optimum recovery from myelopathy:
- Only patients with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were included.
- Functional status evaluated using Benzel's mJOA score.
- Outcome evaluation: The functional outcome was divided into two categories based on mJOA score at latest follow-up. [6]
- mJOA score ≥16: good outcome.
- mJOA score <16: poor outcome.
Statistical analysis and formulation of clinicoradiological score
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics (version 20.0) (SPSS-Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables with distributions assessed for normality. Association was assessed amongst variables using logistic regression analysis. Variables that showed significance at P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The variables, which showed a statistically significant correlation to the outcome, were included in making the prognostic score.
| Results | | |
The study included 15 females and 63 males. [Table 1] presents demographic and diagnostic characteristics of the patients. The mean mJOA score improved from 11.44 ± 3.03 to 14.79 ± 3.02 at 12 months. The anterior approach (discectomy/corpectomy with anterior cervical plating and fusion) was done in 41 patients and posterior approach (laminectomy and fusion) was done in 37 patients. Of these 37 patients, lateral mass fixation was done in 7 patients.
Intraoperative complication in the form of CSF leakage was seen in one patient who underwent corpectomy and anterior cervical plating. The leak stopped spontaneously without the need for addition surgery. One patient who underwent laminectomy had transient C5 paresis, which recovered spontaneously.
We had two long-term complications. One patient had delayed esophageal perforation 15 months following the surgery that was managed by implant removal and feeding by nasogastric tube for 6 weeks. The esophageal perforation healed at 6 weeks. One patient has implant failure in the form of backing out of the anterior cervical plate. Implant removal was done for the same.
Correlation of demographic, clinical, and radiological parameters to the outcome
The association between demographic, clinical, and radiological parameters to the outcome following surgery was assessed using logistic regression analysis. The results are shown in [Table 2]. | Table 2: Logistic regression analysis evaluating the association between demographics, clinical parameters,
radiological parameters and outcome
Click here to view |
Formulation of prognostic score
After correlation of demographic, clinical, and radiological parameters to the functional outcome, it was found that only one of the radiological parameters (Instability) was statistically related to the outcome with a P value <0.05. Gender of the patient, approach to surgery (anterior or posterior), number of levels involved, and diagnosis had no statistically significant effect on the outcome following surgery.
It was found that, six clinical parameters statistically correlated to the outcome following a decompressive surgery. These are age, duration of symptoms, presence or absence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative mJOA score, bowel bladder involvement, and wasting of intrinsic muscles of hand. Incorporating all these parameters, the clinicoradiological scoring system was devised as shown in [Table 3]. Bowel bladder involvement was not included in formulating the clinicoradiological score as mJOA score incorporates sphincter function as a part of scoring system.
Correlation of clinicoradiological score to the outcome
The score devised [as shown in [Table 3]] was calculated for each patient. The score was then correlated to the outcome following surgery. The results of the same are tabulated in [Table 4]. | Table 4: Correlation of clinical score of patients and outcome following surgery
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
The primary findings of this study were that a lower preoperative mJOA score (greater severity), wasting of intrinsic muscles of hand, longer duration of symptoms, old age, and presence of diabetes mellitus were all associated with a decreased probability of a successful outcome. Of the three radiological parameters studied, only presence of instability showed a statistically significant association with the outcome. This study highlights the fact that the clinical parameters are more important in predicting the outcome after a decompressive surgery for CCM rather than radiological findings.
Numerous studies have already proven that the preoperative severity of myelopathy adjudged by mJOA (or JOA) score is the best and most important predictor of the surgical outcome. [1],[6],[7],[8] Our study also showed this and we found that mJOA score ≤ 12 had the most statistically significant correlation with poor outcome with 77% (24 out of 31) while 100% (7 out of 7) patients with mild myelopathy (mJOA score ≥15) had good recovery.
Intrinsic hand muscle wasting forms an important component of patient evaluation. It represents not only the severity, but also the chronicity of compression of spinal cord. In our study, the mean preoperative mJOA score of 32 patients who had wasting was 8.97 ± 2.99 as compared to the mean of 13.17 ± 1.44 of the remaining 46 patients without wasting. Moreover, six patients had intrinsic muscle wasting but a preoperative mJOA score of >12 owing to minimal gait abnormality with preserved sensation and no bowel/bladder involvement. All of these six patients did not have good outcome (postoperative mJOA score was <16). Thus, intrinsic hand muscle wasting is an individual predictor of the outcome.
Studies have shown that longer duration of symptoms have a negative impact on the outcome after surgery. [1],[6],[7],[9] The rationale behind this is that chronic, long-standing compression of the spinal cord may lead to irreversible damage due to demyelination and necrosis of the gray matter. In our study, duration of 12 months was the cutoff below which, 75% (36 of 48) of the patients had good outcome and above it 60% (18 of 30) had poor outcome.
In a survey of members from AOSpine International, 65 years of age was found to be the cutoff above/below which the outcome was affected. [10] In our study, we found this cutoff to be 60 years. In the same survey, most surgeons chose diabetes as the most important comorbidity affecting surgical outcome. [10] Even in our study, these parameters were found to have a statistically significant (P < 0.001) correlation with the outcome.
The clinicoradiological score we propose has a maximum score of 8 and minimum score of 1. Nearly all (45 out of 46, 97.82%) patients with a score of below 5 had good outcome and 100% (23 out of 23) patients with a score above 5 had poor outcome. The outcome is difficult to predict with a score of 5 as 67% (6 of 9) with a score of 5 had poor outcome and the remaining 33% (3 of 9) had good outcome. Thus, a score of less than 5 may be considered as a predictor of good outcome and a score of more than 5 may be considered as a predictor of poor outcome while at a score of 5 the outcome is indeterminate.
The presence of instability, which is detected on dynamic radiographs, has been shown to be significantly associated with poor outcome. This is probably due to the fact that untreated instability leads to repeated micromovement of the vertebral column that may cause irreversible changes in the spinal cord. Our study emphasizes the importance of getting dynamic radiographs done of every patient as the presence of instability not only is an indication for instrumented fusion, but it also has a role in predicting prognosis.
The role of MRI findings as a prognostic indicator is still controversial with report both in favor and against it. [2],[3],[4],[5] Though it has been suggested that transverse area of cord and type 2 signal intensity changes on MRI (hypointense on T1W and hyperintense on T2W images) are also helpful in predicting the outcome, these facilities may not be available at every center as high-quality MRI images are needed for the same. [1] A simple clinicoradiological prognostic score will be helpful in such situation to give the patients an idea regarding functional recovery following surgery.
The limitation of the study is that it is a retrospective analysis of patients operated by a single surgeon in a single tertiary-care hospital. A prospective multicentric study would help in validation of the prognostic score. A relatively smaller sample size is another limitation of the study. Due to suboptimal quality of few MRIs, we could not calculate transverse area of cord in every patient, which is one of the MRI parameters we would have liked to assess.
[TAG:2]CONCLUSION [/TAG:2]
Clinical parameters are better predictors of the outcome as compared to radiological findings, following surgery in case of CCM. Preoperative severity of myelopathy, wasting of intrinsic muscles of hand, longer duration of symptoms, old age, presence of diabetes mellitus, and instability on radiographs were all associated with a decreased probability of a successful outcome. A simple scoring system based on clinicoradiological parameters is suggested in this paper to predict the outcome following surgery in cases of CCM.
Financial support and sponsorship
The authors do not have any other source of support.
Conflicts of interest
All the authors state that we have no conflict of interests.
| References | | |
| 1. | Karpova A, Arun R, Davis AM, Kulkarni AV, Massicotte EM, Mikulis DJ, et al. Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:392-400.  |
| 2. | Nagata K, Ohashi T, Abe J, Morita M, Inoue A. Cervical myelopathy in elderly patients: Clinical results and MRI findings before and after decompression surgery. Spinal Cord 1996;34:220-6. |
| 3. | Singh A, Crockard HA, Platts A, Stevens J. Clinical and radiological correlates of severity and surgery-related outcome in cervical spondylosis. J Neurosurg 2001;94(Suppl):189-98. |
| 4. | Morio Y, Teshima R, Nagashima H, Nawata K, Yamasaki D, Nanjo Y. Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1238-45. |
| 5. | Chen CJ, Lyu RK, Lee ST, Wong YC, Wang LJ. Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Prediction of prognosis with type of intensity. Radiology 2001;221:789-94. |
| 6. | Tetreault LA, Kopjar B, Vaccaro A, Yoon ST, Arnold PM, Massicotte EM, et al. A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: Data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1659-66. |
| 7. | Park YS, Nakase H, Kawaguchi S, Sakaki T, Nikaido Y, Morimoto T. Predictors of outcome of surgery for cervical compressive myelopathy: Retrospective analysis and prospective study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:231-9. |
| 8. | Tetreault LA, Côté P, Kopjar B, Arnold P, Fehlings MG; AOSpine North America and International Clinical Trial Research Network. A clinical prediction model to assess surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Internal and external validations using the prospective multicenter AOSpine North American and international datasets of 743 patients. Spine J 2015;15:388-97. |
| 9. | Machino M, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Inoue T, Kobayakawa A, Matsumoto T, et al. Risk factors for poor outcome of cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with diabetes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:2049-55. |
| 10. | Techy F, Benzel EC. Predictors of outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: The evidence and the international common practice. World Neurosurg 2014;81:503-7. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Prospective Randomized Control Pilot Study to Compare the Role of Injection Cerebrolysin in Operated cases of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy |
|
| Ayush Sharma, Nandan Marathe, Romit Aggarwal, Vijay Singh, Akash Shakya, Prashant Kamble, Ajay Jaiswal, Nilesh Mangale, Brett Rocos | | Spine. 2022; 47(2): E58 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Prognostic Factors Impacting Surgical Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy |
|
| Brian W. Su, Vaib Tadepalli, Pramod N. Kamalapathy, Adam Shimer | | Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication. 2022; 35(10): 418 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
High-impact chronic pain transition in surgical recipients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy |
|
| Chad E. Cook, Steven Z. George, Anthony L. Asher, Erica F. Bisson, Avery L. Buchholz, Mohamad Bydon, Andrew K. Chan, Regis W. Haid, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Paul Park, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Khoi D. Than, Luis M. Tumialan, Michael Y. Wang, Oren N. Gottfried | | Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2022; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Social risk factors predicting outcomes of cervical myelopathy surgery |
|
| Zachary D. Rethorn, Chad E. Cook, Christine Park, Tamara Somers, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Andrew K. Chan, Brenton H. Pennicooke, Erica F. Bisson, Anthony L. Asher, Avery L. Buchholz, Mohamad Bydon, Mohammed Ali Alvi, Domagoj Coric, Kevin T. Foley, Kai-Ming Fu, John J. Knightly, Scott Meyer, Paul Park, Eric A. Potts, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Mark Shaffrey, Khoi D. Than, Luis Tumialan, Jay D. Turner, Cheerag D. Upadhyaya, Michael Y. Wang, Oren Gottfried | | Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2022; : 1 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Clinical predictors of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an external validation study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network |
|
| Nathan Evaniew, David W. Cadotte, Nicolas Dea, Christopher S. Bailey, Sean D. Christie, Charles G. Fisher, Jerome Paquet, Alex Soroceanu, Kenneth C. Thomas, Y. Raja Rampersaud, Neil A. Manson, Michael Johnson, Andrew Nataraj, Hamilton Hall, Greg McIntosh, W. Bradley Jacobs | | Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2020; 33(2): 129 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
