|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 293-299
Combined transoral exoscope and OArm-assisted approach for craniovertebral junction surgery: Light and shadows in single-center experience with improving technologies
Massimiliano Visocchi1, Pier Paolo Mattogno1, Pasqualino Ciappetta2, Giuseppe Barbagallo3, Francesco Signorelli1
1 Institute of Neurosurgery, Operative Unit, Research Center and Master II Degree Surgical Approaches Craniovertebral Junction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bari, Medical School, Bari, Italy
3 Departement of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico Gaspare Rodolico University Hospital, Catania, Italy
|Date of Submission||13-Oct-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Oct-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||26-Nov-2020|
Pier Paolo Mattogno
Institute of Neurosurgery, Operative Unit, Research Center and Master II Degree Surgical Approaches Craniovertebral Junction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: The introduction of recent innovations in the field of intraoperative imaging and neuronavigation, such as OArm Stealth Station, allows to obtain crucial intraoperative data by performing safer and controlled surgical procedures. As part of the improvement of surgical visual magnification and wide expansion of surgical corridors, the 3D-4K exoscope (EX) represents nowadays an interesting and useful tool. Transoral approach (TOA) represents the historical gold standard direct microsurgical route to ventral craniovertebral junction (CVJ).
Methods: We herein report a preliminary experience on 6 cases of 33 patients operated by TOA concerning the simultaneous application of OArm with Stealth Navigation system (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) and imaging system along with the 3D-4K EXs in TOA for the treatment of CVJ pathologies.
Results: Neither intraoperative neurophysiological changes nor postoperative infections occurred, but a neurological improvement was evident in all the patients. A complete decompression along with stable instrumentation and fusion of the CVJ was accomplished in all cases at the maximum follow-up (mean: 16.8 months).
Conclusions: With EX, the role of surgeon become self-sufficient with a better individual surgical freedom compared to endoscopic surgery and excellent 3D vision and magnification. OArm allows an absolutely reliable intraoperative support for a more effective CVJ decompression. Nevertheless, with OArm-assisted neuronavigation, it can be difficult to navigate C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi, and to convert 3D into 2D real-time navigation, it can become quite complicate. Finally, the association of EX and OArm appears more time consuming compared to the old fashion one.
Keywords: Craniovertebral junction, exoscope, OArm neuronavigation, transoral
|How to cite this article:|
Visocchi M, Mattogno PP, Ciappetta P, Barbagallo G, Signorelli F. Combined transoral exoscope and OArm-assisted approach for craniovertebral junction surgery: Light and shadows in single-center experience with improving technologies. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2020;11:293-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Visocchi M, Mattogno PP, Ciappetta P, Barbagallo G, Signorelli F. Combined transoral exoscope and OArm-assisted approach for craniovertebral junction surgery: Light and shadows in single-center experience with improving technologies. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 27];11:293-9. Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2020/11/4/293/301630
| Introduction|| |
Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) congenital or acquired compressive pathologies can lead to acute or chronic medullary damage.
Depending on the location, size, and nature of the disease, surgical approaches to CVJ have traditionally been addressed to the ventral, dorsal, and lateral aspects through a variety of 360° surgical corridors.,
Transoral approach (TOA) represents the historical gold standard direct microsurgical route to ventral CVJ, in particular to the anterior portion of the lower clivus, the anterior arch of C1, and the odontoid and body of C2, with differences between patients due to individual anatomical variability.,,,,,
The introduction of recent technological innovations in the field of intraoperative imaging and neuronavigation, such as OArm Stealth Station ® (Medtronic, Memphis, TN), allows to obtain crucial intraoperative data by performing safer and controlled surgical procedures. As part of the improvement of surgical visual magnification and wide expansion of surgical corridors, the 3D-4K Exoscope (EX) represents nowadays a very interesting and useful tool.,
The present paper describes the preliminary experience of the simultaneous application of OArm intraoperative neuronavigation and imaging system along with the 3D-4K EX in TOA for the treatment of CVJ pathologies. In this paper, We report the operative strategy related to this updated technical support, the advantages, the tip and tricks, along with possible disappointments, are reported; light and shadows, the efficacy and safety of surgical tools used are discussed according to personal experience and current literature.
| Methods|| |
Our experience at the Department of Neurosurgery of Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, started in 1998 with CVJ instrumentation procedures and in 2011 with anterior decompressive transmucosal procedures both performed with classic operative microscope (OM), endoscopic microsurgical techniques, with neurophysiological (motor-evoked potential [MEP] and sensory-evoked potential [SSEP]), and neuroradiological (fluoroscopy and neuronavigation) monitoring.
Among 33 patients harboring irreducible CVJ compressive pathologies, 7 patients were operated on by transnasal approach and 25 patients underwent decompressive TOA up to date [Table 1].
|Table 1: Characteristics of patient operated on by anterior transmucosal approach (transoral/transnasal) and posterior fusion|
Click here to view
For 19 TOA patients, a classic fluoroscopic monitoring along with endoscopic/OM magnification has been used.
In the past 2 years (January 2018), six patients harboring CVJ compressive pathologies underwent one-step combined anterior neurosurgical decompression and posterior instrumentation and fusion technique [Table 2]. After 3 days in neurosurgical intensive care unit, all the patients underwent complete preoperative radiologic workup by means of magnetic resonance (MR), (computed tomography [CT]) scan, along with a 3D angiographic reconstruction of the epiaortic vessels, and standard/dynamic X-ray evaluation of the CVJ.
|Table 2: Subgroup of patients treated with exoscope and neuronavigation OArm-assisted|
Click here to view
Preoperative, short-lasting percutaneous tracheostomy was performed in all the six patients.
Technical armamentarium included for all – OArm-assisted Neuronavigation (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) and EX, in detail, two cases were operated with VITOM ® 3D Exoscope (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) and three cases were treated with ORBEYE ® Exoscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan). In the same operating theater, it was also available one OM for a possible use in emergency (OPMI Pentero or Carl Zeiss and Leica) and Endoscopy 0° and 30° (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring by means of SSEPs and MEPs was performed in all the patients in both anterior and posterior procedures as well. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered intraoperatively and postoperatively (cefazoline 2 g/day). A nasogastric tube was used for enteral feeding for 1 week and percutaneous tracheostomy was removed in 10 days in all the patients. All the patients were discharged in 2 weeks.
The complete postoperative radiological set (MR imaging, CT scan, and X-ray assessment), obtained before discharge, was repeated every 3 months up to the complete bone fusion assessment.
Nurick's Grade at different time points was considered [Table 3]. Significant changes (P < 0.05) are marked with an asterisk according to one-way repeated-measures ANOVA.
Anterior surgical procedure
In the supine position, the head was placed in a 3-point skull fixation system (Mayfield Headrest) and the neck slightly extended.
The Crockard transoral distractor (Crockard Transoral Instrument Set; Codman and Shurtleff, Raynham, MA, USA) was inserted in the oral cavity and a preoperative 3D radiographic reconstruction with OArm Stealth Station (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) was acquired.
Under EX vision, a midline longitudinal incision on the posterior pharyngeal wall was performed, the longus colli and longus capitis muscles were mobilized laterally and held in place with tooth-bladed lateral pharyngeal retractors to expose the inferior clivus, anterior arch of C1, and C2 vertebral body [Figure 1]c. Under magnification and neuronavigation, the inferior third, the anterior arch of C1, and the odontoid process along with a variable segment of the C2 body were removed using a high-speed drill and a dedicated Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator probe (Sonopet ® Ultrasonic Aspirator) [Figure 1]d. The transverse ligament, tectorial membrane, and any residual ligaments were removed, so decompressing the CVJ dura mater adequately. After that, further O-Arm acquisition was performed to verify and eventually complete decompression [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. The closure was obtained by approximating the three mucosal layers with 3-0 vicryl interrupted sutures.
|Figure 1: (a) Operating theater with Orbeye® Exoscope system and Medtronic Stealth Station® system. (b) OArm® medtronic acquisition. (c) Exoscopic vision of midline oropharynx incision with Crockard® spreader. (d) Intraoperative exoscopic view of odontoid ultrasonic fragmentation and suction: the dural layer (black star) is partially exposed|
Click here to view
Posterior surgical procedure
In the prone position, the head was placed in a 3-point skull fixation system (Mayfield headrest) and the neck slightly flexed; a preoperative 3D radiographic reconstruction with OArm (Medtronic) was acquired.
Under EX vision and magnification, by means of a midline linear incision, C0–C3 skeletonization was performed to expose posterior CVJ. With the aid of neuronavigation, a posterior instrumentation was variably performed. We used screws into the occipital crest in cases 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and case 4 (redo surgery). On the other hands, C2 isthmic screws were put in cases 4 and 6, laminar screws in cases 1, 2, 3, 5, and case 4 (redo surgery), in C3 lateral masses in cases 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and case 4 (redo surgery). In one case, screws were put also in C4 (case 5) (OCT 2-VUE POIN® Nuvasive System). All the constructs were fixed with bilateral hinged rods [Table 2]. Bone Fusion was performed by decorticating the occiput and posterior arches of the cervical facet joints by high-speed drill and curettes, along with demineralized bone paste (AttraX ® PUTTY Nuvasive) to stimulate bone fusion. Finally, further OArm acquisition documented the satisfactory placement of the stabilization system.
The clinical follow-up evaluation was performed according to the Nurick's Grade at different time points. According to one-way repeated-measures ANOVA, changes are considered significant when P < 0.05.
| Results|| |
Neither intraoperative neurophysiological changes nor postoperative infections occurred, but a neurological improvement was evident in all the patients.
A complete decompression along with stable instrumentation and fusion of the CVJ was accomplished in all the cases at the maximum follow-up (mean: 16.8 months) [Table 1]. In two cases (case 1 and 3), OArm navigation allowed to identify residual compression was not clearly visible using the microscope alone. No dysphagia, dysphonia, and nasal regurgitation of fluids were present at the latest follow-up except the progressive disappearance of nasal regurgitation in case 2, harboring a Down Syndrome, with severe preoperative disturbances. Postoperative X-rays and CT showed a correct (except for patient 4 in whom it was suboptimal) hardware system positioning. MR confirmed the effective decompression of neural structures in all the patients, with a variable reduction of the bulbomedullary junction hyperintensity when present [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Pre- and postoperative sagittal MRI (a and b) and CT scan (c and d) showing severe atlantoaxial disalignment with detachment of the odontoid with severe stenosis caudally to the foramen magnum and myelopathy (a and c). Panel b and d show anterior decompression of C1, removal of os odontoideum, with marked enlargement of the occipital foramen and disappearance of the stenosis. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, CT: Computed tomography|
Click here to view
In four cases, it was not possible to navigate C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi due to target the obliquity unfitting with the neuronavigation optical system, so misleading the surgeon and strongly suggesting to change surgical strategy intraoperatively (occipitocervical with C2 laminar and C3 lateral masses screwing). In another case (case 4), it was possible to navigate and to perform both C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi screwing, resulting in suboptimal screws placement at the immediate postoperative assessment. In this case, the hardware dislodgment occurred 2 months later requiring the only posterior redo surgery performed in the present series.
The mean operation time (overall considering the two procedures) was 528 min ± 11.78 in cases with EX and OArm and 468 min ± 7.4 in cases previously published without EX and OArm (difference 60 min). No clinical worsening was reported. All the patients significantly improved according to the Nurick Score at the maximum follow-up [Figure 3] and [Table 3].
|Figure 3: Nurick's Grade at different time points. Significant changes (P < 0.05) are marked with an asterisk in the graph|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In recent years, surgery has been enriched with the introduction of new tools, which are representing a “revolution” in operating techniques. In the neurosurgical field, the EX represents one of the technological innovations that most attracts a growing interest among neurosurgeons: EX has characteristics not inferior to the most modern surgical microscopes, featuring high definition (HD) magnification, an immersive vision of the operating field, a wide focal distance, and the presence of built-in filters very useful in the course of oncologic surgical procedures (i.e., 5-ALA, infracyanine).
In addition, 3D technology allows the surgeon to recover and improve the stereopsis that is generally experienced with OM. Moreover, the holding arm allows extreme freedom of movement and modification of the surgical corridor, enhanced by the possibility of making micromovements and adjustments through a foot pedal controller.,, In terms of ergonomics and surgical setup, the EX is much less bulky and manageable than the OM and allows surgeons to have more surgical space and a more ergonomically correct position for both the first surgeon and the assistant surgeon.,
Several papers in the literature present preliminary experiences in the application of EX to microneurosurgery, both in studies on animal and cadaveric models, and in vivo, specifically in the field of neuroncology, vascular surgery, skull base surgery, and minimally invasive spine surgery.,,,,,,,,
After an initial adaptation phase and a learning curve, the surgeons' first impression shows excellent feedback, both in terms of a wide range of movements and an evident improvement in terms ergonomics and the possibility of surgical angles not possible with the traditional OM.,
Concerning spine surgery, several papers have described the use of EX mainly for noninstrumented or instrumented posterior thoracolumbar approaches; significantly fewer reports describe anterior approaches to the cervical spine.
To our knowledge, only a case series of 3D Ex-assisted TOA for oropharyngeal cancers or infection is reported in the literature.
The two surgical EXs we used in our procedures were the VITOM ® Exoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) and the ORBEYE ® Exoscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Recent papers compare the technical characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of the two EXs. Both instruments feature the telescopic function with HD-4K 3D magnification, with a comparable zoom capability (×8–30 Vitom vs. ×26 Orbeye). However, in our experience, ORBEYE ® displayed a significantly greater focal length (220–550 vs. 20–50 mm). with this feature, although it is more recumbent, it can be placed distant from the operating field and is not intrusive or hindering for surgeons. Furthermore, ORBEYE ® EX is equipped with a pneumatic arm with assisted movement; for this reason, it is much easier to mobilize than VITOM ®; furthermore, through the foot pedal, it is possible to carry out very useful coaxial micromovements of the optics.
OArm neuronavigation and intraoperatory system
In spinal surgery, the introduction of OArm system has improved the safety of instrumentation procedures, allowing much more accurate intraoperative neuronavigation than traditional techniques; moreover, the setting with intraoperative imaging allows a real-time verification of the effectiveness of the procedure, such as in cases of medullary decompression or the correct positioning of arthrodesis systems.,
In CVJ surgery, OArm acquisition, comparing to fluoroscopy, has the obvious advantage of a better definition with a resulting easier screws insertion; furthermore, it permits an intraoperative direct and indirect assessment of bony and ligamentous CVJ anterior decompression. In two of six cases, after OArm acquisition, the craniocaudal decompression was augmented because it proved to be suboptimal in an absolutely reliable and anatomically detailed way. Otherwise, in our previous experience concerning fluoroscopic monitoring of TOA, the use of Iopamiro, as contrast filler of the surgical cavity, allowed in a quite fair way to, indirectly, evaluate possible residual compression at the CVJ [Figure 4]., However, it does not provide a real-time visualization.
|Figure 4: (a) Metrizamide fluoroscopic intracavitary assessment of the degree of bone removal at C1–C2. (b) Intraoperative OArm neuronavigation tracking in sagittal reconstruction. (c) Intraoperative OArm neuronavigation tracking in axial reconstruction|
Click here to view
Finally, the possibility to convert the intraoperative neuronavigated 3D modality into 2D real-time OArm monitoring is very unconfortable due to the poor space available for the surgeon (also in the presence of EX) and the need of complex, time-consuming, and uneffective surgical maneuvers required.
Therefore, sufficient experience in posterior CVJ complex surgery and confidence with OArm navigation are needed to safely perform this procedure, as demonstrated by a longer (60 min) mean operation time of this series compared to the personal previous data published.
Finally, by reviewing the current literature, this is the first report of a clinical simultaneous OArm intraoperative neuronavigation along with the 3D-4K EX use in TOA. Lights and shadows of both are discussed below and summarized in [Table 2].
3D-4K exoscope lights
- EX allows a better magnification compared to the OM and an image screen transposition similar to the 4K endoscopic ones, without the need to handle any specific probe
- In such a condition, the role of surgeon become self-sufficient with a better individual surgical freedom compared to endoscopic surgery.
3D-4K exoscope shadows
- A complex learning curve is necessary to spare unuseful time-consuming extra surgical maneuvers related to frequent camera adjustments
- When facing with deep and narrow surgical field, as transoral surgery, the use of EX may lead to a decreased depth perception and consequently increase the operative time.
OArm neuronavigation system lights
- OArm allows an absolutely reliable intraoperative support for a more effective CVJ decompression. In fact, it allows a reliable decompression assessment and an appropriate and reliable real-time neuronavigation compared to preoperative neuroradiological CT and/or MR neuronavigation
- OArm always allows axial, sagittal, and coronal intraoperative reconstructions compared to standard preoperative neuroradiological CT and/or MR neuronavigation, which rarely has a preoperative coexisting navigable axial, sagittal, and coronal image assessment.
OArm neuronavigation system shadows
- OArm is more time consuming and much more complex to use compared to 2D C-Arm as well as preoperative neuroradiological CT and/or MR assessment neuronavigation
- The planning as well as the organization of surgery results more difficult due the need to have the concomitant availability of specialized technical support
- OArm can mislead the surgeon when facing with C1–C2 posterior instrumentation procedures. In some cases, navigation of C1 lateral masses and C2 isthmi appears quite impossible; infact the extreme inclination of the target can make difficult to the wand to communicate with the receiver (main antenna of the neuronavigation system); in such a situation, it seems very complicated to convert 3D into 2D real-time navigation due to the limited space offered to the surgeon by the OArm compared to the one offered by the C-Arm continuous fluoroscopy.
| Conclusions|| |
Although light and shadows of such an association are shown in our experience, the possible advantages of the simultaneous use of 3D-4K EX and OArm intraoperative neuronavigation deserve consideration.
Adding technology to technology does not always add knowledge.
Nevertheless, the operative improvement of 3D-4K EX and OArm association in the future TOA will provide further tips and tricks parallel to the progressive growth of personal experience.
Future experiences dealing with such simultaneous applications in CVJ surgical field will provide new knowledge, so implementing current literature and proposing more effective suggestions to overcome actual shadows.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Visocchi M. Why the craniovertebral junction? Acta Neurochir Suppl 2019;125:3-8.
Signorelli F, Stumpo V, Oliva A, Pascali VL, Olivi A, Visocchi M. Mastering craniovertebral junction surgical approaches: The dissection laboratory experience at the catholic university of rome. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2019;125:13-5.
Visocchi M, Iacopino DG, Signorelli F, Olivi A, Maugeri R. Walk the line. The surgical highways to the craniovertebral junction in endoscopic approaches: A historical perspective. World Neurosurg 2018;110:544-57.
Visocchi M, Signorelli F, Liao C, Rigante M, Paludetti G, Barbagallo G, et al
. Transoral versus transnasal approach for craniovertebral junction pathologies: Never say never. World Neurosurg 2018;110:592-603.
Visocchi M, Di Martino A, Maugeri R, González Valcárcel I, Grasso V, Paludetti G. Videoassisted anterior surgical approaches to the craniocervical junction: Rationale and clinical results. Eur Spine J 2015;24:2713-23.
Visocchi M. Transnasal and transoral approach to the clivus and the craniovertebral junction. J Neurosurg Sci 2019;63:498-500.
Visocchi M, La Rocca G, Della Pepa GM, Stigliano E, Costantini A, Di Nardo F, et al
. Anterior video-assisted approach to the craniovertebral junction: Transnasal or transoral? A cadaver study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:285-92.
Visocchi M, Pappalardo G, Pileggi M, Signorelli F, Paludetti G, La Rocca G. Experimental endoscopic angular domains of transnasal and transoral routes to the craniovertebral junction: Light and shade. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:669-77.
Ricciardi L, Mattogno PP, Olivi A, Sturiale CL. Exoscope era: Next technical and educational step in microneurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2019;128:371-3.
Lauretti L, D'Alessandris QG, Rigante M, Ricciardi L, Mattogno PP, Olivi A. O-arm in endonasal endoscopic cranial base surgery: Technical note on initial feasibility. World Neurosurg 2018;117:103-8.
Langer DJ, White TG, Schulder M, Boockvar JA, Labib M, Lawton MT. Advances in intraoperative optics: A brief review of current exoscope platforms. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019. pii: Opz276.
Ricciardi L, Chaichana KL, Cardia A, Stifano V, Rossini Z, Olivi A, Sturiale CL. The exoscope in neurosurgery: An innovative “point of view”. A systematic review of the technical, surgical and educational aspects. World Neurosurg 2019. pii: S1878-8750(19)30080-4.
Sack J, Steinberg JA, Rennert RC, Hatefi D, Pannell JS, Levy M, et al
. Initial experience using a high-definition 3-dimensional exoscope system for microneurosurgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;14:395-401.
Ariffin MHM, Ibrahim K, Baharudin A, Tamil AM. Early experience, setup, learning curve, benefits, and complications associated with exoscope and three-dimensional 4K hybrid digital visualizations in minimally invasive spine surgery. Asian Spine J 2020;14:59-65.
Crosetti E, Arrigoni G, Manca A, Caracciolo A, Bertotto I, Succo G. 3D exoscopic surgery (3Des) for transoral oropharyngectomy. Front Oncol 2020;10:16.
Mamelak AN, Drazin D, Shirzadi A, Black KL, Berci G. Infratentorial supracerebellar resection of a pineal tumor using a high definition video exoscope (VITOM®). J Clin Neurosci 2012;19:306-9.
Shirzadi A, Mukherjee D, Drazin DG, Paff M, Perri B, Mamelak AN, et al
. Use of the video telescope operating monitor (VITOM) as an alternative to the operating microscope in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E1517-23.
Bakhsheshian J, Strickland BA, Jackson C, Chaichana KL, Young R, Pradilla G, et al
. Multicenter investigation of channel-based subcortical trans-sulcal exoscopic resection of metastatic brain tumors: A retrospective case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019;16:159-66.
Iyer R, Chaichana KL. Minimally invasive resection of deep-seated high-grade gliomas using tubular retractors and exoscopic visualization. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg 2018;79:330-6.
Gassie K, Wijesekera O, Chaichana KL. Minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted biopsy and resection of subcortical intra-axial gliomas and other neoplasms. J Neurosurg Sci 2018;62:682-9.
Oertel JM, Burkhardt BW. Vitom-3D for exoscopic neurosurgery: Initial experience in cranial and spinal procedures. World Neurosurg 2017;105:153-62.
Iwata T, Toyota S, Kudo A, Nakagawa K, Shimizu T, Murakami T, et al
. Microsurgery “under the eaves” using ORBEYE: A case of dural arteriovenous fistula of the anterior cranial fossa. World Neurosurg 2020;138:178-81.
Farah K, Coudert P, Graillon T, Blondel B, Dufour H, Gille O, et al
. Prospective comparative study in spine surgery between O-arm and airo systems: Efficacy and radiation exposure. World Neurosurg 2018;118:e175-84.
Knafo S, Mireau E, Bennis S, Baussart B, Aldea S, Gaillard S. Operative and perioperative durations in O-arm vs. C-arm fluoroscopy for lumbar instrumentation. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;14:273-8.
Visocchi M, Della Pepa GM, Doglietto F, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Massimi L. Video-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: Personal experience in childhood. Childs Nerv Syst 2011;27:825-31.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]