|
 |
| CASE REPORT |
|
| Year : 2022 | Volume
: 13
| Issue : 2 | Page : 192-197 |
|
|
Spinal cervical extradural hemangioblastoma
Giuseppe Mariniello1, Sergio Corvino1, Giuseppe Corazzelli1, Raduan Ahmed Franca2, Marialaura Del Basso De Caro2, Francesco Maiuri1
1 Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
2 Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Pathology, University “Federico II” of Naples, Naples, Italy
| Date of Submission | 23-Nov-2021 |
| Date of Acceptance | 08-May-2022 |
| Date of Web Publication | 13-Jun-2022 |
Correspondence Address:
Sergio Corvino
Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Science, Neurosurgical Clinic, “Federico II” University School of Medicine, 5, Via S. Pansini, Naples 80131
Italy
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_146_21
 Abstract | | |
Spinal cervical extradural and intra-extradural hemangioblastomas are exceptional, with only nine reported cases. This study reviews the diagnostic and surgical problems of this rare entity. Two female patients, aged 80 years and 25 years, respectively, one with Von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHLD), experienced brachial pain and weakness. On magnetic resonance imaging, a dumbbell intra-extraspinal hemangioblastoma was evidenced. The surgical resection through posterior laminectomy resulted in clinical remission of brachial pain and weakness. The magnetic resonance aspect of a dumbbell lesion suggests a neurogenic tumor; the correct preoperative diagnosis is possible in individuals with VHLD. The surgical problems include high tumor vascularity, vertebral artery control, and nerve root preservation. However, the surgical excision results in clinical remission.
Keywords: Dumbbell tumor, hemangioblastoma, spinal extradural hemangioblastoma
How to cite this article:
Mariniello G, Corvino S, Corazzelli G, Franca RA, Caro MD, Maiuri F. Spinal cervical extradural hemangioblastoma. J Craniovert Jun Spine 2022;13:192-7 |
How to cite this URL:
Mariniello G, Corvino S, Corazzelli G, Franca RA, Caro MD, Maiuri F. Spinal cervical extradural hemangioblastoma. J Craniovert Jun Spine [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jun 2];13:192-7. Available from: https://www.jcvjs.com/text.asp?2022/13/2/192/347318 |
| Introduction | |  |
Hemangioblastomas are benign, highly vascular neoplasms accounting for 2% of all intracranial tumors and 2%–10% of the primary spinal cord tumors.[1],[2] They may occur as sporadic forms (70%–80%) or in the contest of Von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHLD).[3] The posterior fossa is the most common location (45%–50%),[4] followed by the spinal cord (40%–45%)[5],[6] and brainstem (5%–10%).[7]
Spinal hemangioblastoma are intramedullary (75%) or extramedullary (25%); extramedullary tumors are mainly located at the cauda equina, at the filum terminale, and, less frequently, in the spinal nerve root.[8] Hemangioblastomas occurring at the neural foramen, in contact with the nerve root, may have an intradural component or may be purely extradural. The 40 reported cases of extradural hemangioblastomas were located mainly in the thoracic spine (54%), followed by the lumbar (33%) and cervical spine (13%).[9]
This study reports two cases of spinal cervical foraminal hemangioblastomas and reviews the pertinent literature of cases with intra-extraforaminal extension. The preoperative diagnosis and the surgical problems of these rare hemangioblastomas are discussed.
| Case Reports | | |
Case 1
An 80-year-old woman was observed in 2010 for a 3-month history of pain in her left shoulder and progressive weakness of her left arm. The brachial pain suddenly worsened some days before the observation.
Magnetic resonance of the cervical spine [Figure 1] revealed an extradural mass on the left side of the spinal canal at C4–C5, extending to the left C4–C5 vertebral foramen, which was enlarged. The mass was isointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images and showed intralesional hemorrhagic spots and strong and homogeneous contrast enhancement. Marked spinal cord displacement was evident. The preoperative radiological diagnosis was schwannoma. | Figure 1: Preoperative MRI of the cervical spine. Sagittal (a) and axial. (b and c) sequences: Before (a) and after (b and c) contrast administration, a large, predominantly hyperintense extradural lesion at C4–C5 level, with heterogeneous prominent vascular flow voids and intralesional bleeding; it occupies the left side of the spinal canal, causing contralateral displacement of the spinal cord and extends through the left C4–C5 vertebral foramen in the parasagittal space. (d) Postoperative MRI, sagittal T2 sequence: Resolution of the spinal cord compression with slight residual hyperintense signal, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging
Click here to view |
The neurological examination at admission showed gait impairment, weakness of the proximal muscles on the left arm, decreased bicipital reflex, and hypoesthesia in the left C4 territory.
At operation through C4–C5 laminectomy, a grayish, highly vascularized, wholly extradural mass with intralesional blood infiltration was found, displacing the spinal cord and extending to the left neural foramen. Complete tumor resection was obtained after easy dissection from the nerve root. The intradural exploration did not reveal residual tumor.
The postoperative course was characterized by pain remission and improvement of weakness in the left arm.
The histologic examination [Figure 2] revealed vascular proliferation mainly composed of small vessels arranged in a lobular fashion and lacunar spaces, in the absence of cytological atypia and with moderate hemorrhage. | Figure 2: Histologic study of case 1: Vascular proliferation mainly composed of small vessels arranged in a lobular fashion and lacunar spaces. There is no cytological atypia. Moderate amount of hemorrhage was evident (H and E, ×40)
Click here to view |
The immunohistochemical studies revealed positivity for CD34 and CD31 and partially positivity for factor VIII, while S100, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and European medicines agency were negative. The diagnosis was in favor of hemangioblastoma.
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine confirmed the tumor removal and resolution of the spinal cord compression [Figure 1]d.
At the last follow-up, 7 years after surgery, the patient was symptom-free, with no tumor recurrence.
Case 2
A 25-year-old woman with a familial history of VHLD was referred to our neurosurgical unit in March 2018 for a 2-year history of left brachial pain not responsive to medical treatment. Magnetic resonance of the cervical spine showed a hyperintense extramedullary mass at C6–C7 level, occupying the left side of the spinal canal, with extension to the neural foramen and thickening of the C7 nerve root. However, the patient refused surgery. One year later, she was again observed for worsening of the clinical symptoms, onset of paresthesia on the left hand, and gait instability. The neurologic examination showed ataxic gait, weakness, and hypoesthesia of the left arm.
A postcontrast MRI of the cervical spine showed slight increase in the tumor size (15 mm × 28 mm), with inhomogeneous enhancement; the tumor extended toward the left C6–C7 vertebral foramen in the extradural space, causing enlargement of the neural foramen. Significant compression of the spinal cord was evident [Figure 3]. | Figure 3: Preoperative cervical spine contrast-enhanced MRI. Axial (a), coronal (b) and sagittal (c) T1-weighted sequences: intravertebral extradural lesion, with non-homogenous contrast-enhancement, displacing contralaterally the spinal cord and extending through the left C6–C7 vertebral foramen in the extradural space, causing enlargement of the neural foramen
Click here to view |
In April 2019, the patient underwent surgery through C6–C7 laminectomy. A fibrous capsulated vascular tumor was exposed in the left half of the spinal canal, extending into the radicular foramen. The wide foraminotomy allowed to expose the lateral tumor portion, mainly located extradurally. With the help of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, the tumor mass was removed; however, a far lateral fragment strongly adherent to the extradural nerve root was left.
The postoperative course was characterized by the remission of the pain and hyposthenia of the left arm.
The histologic examination was consistent with cellular variant of hemangioblastoma [Figure 4]. | Figure 4: Histologic study of case 2: Highly vascular neoplasm predominantly composed of polygonal cells arranged in lobules with a clear cytoplasm. The finding suggests diagnosis of cellular variant of hemangioblastoma (H and E, ×40)
Click here to view |
At the last follow-up, 2 years after surgery, the patient is symptom-free with a stable residual tumor.
| Discussion | | |
Spinal cervical hemangioblastomas extending extradurally into the vertebral foramina and in the paravertebral space are exceptional, with only nine reported cases in the English literature.[8],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] The data of the 11 patients (including 2 of ours own) are summarized in [Table 1]. The patients where the data were completely available were 6 females and 3 males, with age ranging from 24 to 80 years (median 41 years). Eight cases were sporadic and three were familial in the context of VHLD. The distribution according to the spinal level from C4 to T1 was homogeneous. Brachial pain and/or brachial weakness due to nerve root compression were the initial clinical complaint in all cases; three out of 9 also had symptoms and signs of spinal cord compression. | Table 1: Data of the reported cases of spinal cervical foraminal hemangioblastomas with extradural extension
Click here to view |
On MRI, the tumor mass showed intense contrast enhancement with a highly vascular aspect. Variable widening of the nerve root foramen with bone erosion was found in all cases, whereas ventral displacement of the vertebral artery was evidenced in three with large extradural tumor component. The complete surgical resection was obtained in four of the eight patients where this finding is specified; incomplete resections were decided to preserve the extradural nerve root.
The follow-up, specified in 7 cases, ranged from 6 to 84 months (median 23 months). Complete clinical remission was obtained in seven among eight patients. One patient experienced tumor recurrence at 2 years, treated by a second surgery.
Cervical foraminal extradural or intra-extradural hemangioblastomas are an exceptional cause of brachial pain and weakness. Although other far more common pathologies, mainly discoarthrosic, are involved, the presence of a foraminal hemangioblastoma should be suspected in individuals with VHLD who develop brachial pain.
Our patient of case 1 experienced sudden worsening of the brachial pain some days before the observation; at the operation, intralesional and extralesional bleeding was evidenced. Symptomatic bleeding is found from 2.9%[17] to 5.5%[18] of central nervous system hemangioblastomas, with a probability of 0.0024 per person per year.[17]
The MRI appearance of a dumbbell intra-extraspinal tumor mass associated to enlargement of the intervertebral foramen first suggests a neurogenic tumor, such as schwannoma or neurofibroma.[10],[13],[15],[16] Hemangioblastoma shows intense and often irregular contrast enhancement due to the presence of prominent tumor vessels with dilated arteries and veins; on the other hand, schwannoma enhances intensely and fairly homogeneously. However, because of the very rare occurrence of dumbbell intra-extraspinal hemangioblastomas, the correct diagnosis is suspected only in patients with VHLD. Malignant tumors, such as metastases and malignant nerve sheath tumors, may be ruled out, as they are associated with erosion and infiltration of the bone structures.[9]
The problems of the surgical resection include choice of approach, high tumor vascularity, vertebral artery control, and nerve root preservation.
The posterior approach through laminectomy was used in 5 of 7 reviewed cases (including ours) where this finding is specified. It allows good tumor control, but the separation of the tumor from the vertebral artery is performed blindly. Thus, cases with significant compression of the vertebral artery may require a lateral cervical approach;[12] it allows to control of both the nerve root and the vertebral artery before the tumor resection, as well as eventual feeders to the tumor mass.
In three reviewed cases.[12],[13],[16] the preoperative embolization of the highly vascular tumor mass was necessary. However, this procedure is not free of complications, including extravasion of embolic particles and bleeding. Besides, some large studies[19],[20] show that the amount of blood loss and the extent of resection were similar in cases with and without preoperative embolization. Thus, this procedure must be reserved to really high-risk cases for intraoperative bleeding.[9]
| Conclusion | | |
Extradural and dumbbell intra-extraspinal cervical hemangioblastomas are exceptional lesions causing brachial pain and weakness. Their dumbbell intra-extraspinal radiological aspect suggests a neurogenic tumor; the correct diagnosis should be suspected in patients with VHLD. Complete surgical resection using circumferential dissection while preserving the nerve root is the treatment of choice and results in clinical remission.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Rachinger J, Buslei R, Prell J, Strauss C. Solid haemangioblastomas of the CNS: A review of 17 consecutive cases. Neurosurg Rev 2009;32:37-47.  |
| 2. | Bründl E, Schödel P, Ullrich OW, Brawanski A, Schebesch KM. Surgical resection of sporadic and hereditary hemangioblastoma: Our 10-year experience and a literature review. Surg Neurol Int 2014;5:138. |
| 3. | Lonser RR, Butman JA, Huntoon K, Asthagiri AR, Wu T, Bakhtian KD, et al. Prospective natural history study of central nervous system hemangioblastomas in Von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1055-62. |
| 4. | Constans JP, Meder F, Maiuri F, Donzelli R, Spaziante R, de Divitiis E. Posterior fossa hemangioblastomas. Surg Neurol 1986;25:269-75. |
| 5. | Mandigo CE, Ogden AT, Angevine PD, McCormick PC. Operative management of spinal hemangioblastoma. Neurosurgery 2009;65:1166-77. |
| 6. | Wang H, Zhang L, Wang H, Nan Y, Ma Q. Spinal hemangioblastoma: Surgical procedures, outcomes and review of the literature. Acta Neurol Belg 2021;121:973-81. |
| 7. | Yin X, Duan H, Yi Z, Li C, Lu R, Li L. Incidence, prognostic factors and survival for hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system: Analysis based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Front Oncol 2020;10:570103. |
| 8. | Murota T, Symon L. Surgical management of hemangioblastoma of the spinal cord: A report of 18 cases. Neurosurgery 1989;25:699-707. |
| 9. | Arumalla K, Deora H, Rao S, Shashidhar A, Rao MB. Spinal extradural hemangioblastoma: A systematic review of characteristics and outcomes. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2020;11:254-61. |
| 10. | Bilgen IG, Yünten N, Demirtas E, Cagli S, Zileli M. Hemangioblastoma causing cervical neural foraminal widening. J Neuroradiol 2001;28:205-8. |
| 11. | Escott EJ, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Brega K, Lillehei KO. Proximal nerve root spinal hemangioblastomas: Presentation of three cases, MR appearance, and literature review. Surg Neurol 2004;61:262-73. |
| 12. | Barrey C, Kalamarides M, Polivka M, George B. Cervical dumbbell intra-extradural hemangioblastoma: Total removal through the lateral approach: Technical case report. Neurosurgery 2005;56:E625. |
| 13. | Sid-Ahmed S, Seizeur R, Forlodou P, Dam-Hieu P, Quintin-Roue I, Person H, et al. Dumbell hemangioblastoma of the eighth cervical nerve root. Neurochirurgie 2006;52:533-6. |
| 14. | Doyle LA, Fletcher CD. Peripheral hemangioblastoma: Clinicopathologic characterization in a series of 22 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:119-27. |
| 15. | Gläsker S, Berlis A, Pagenstecher A, Vougioukas VI, Van Velthoven V. Characterization of hemangioblastomas of spinal nerves. Neurosurgery 2005;56:503-9. |
| 16. | |
| 17. | Gläsker S, Van Velthoven V. Risk of hemorrhage in hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system. Neurosurgery 2005;57:71-6. |
| 18. | Ene CI, Morton RP, Ferreira M Jr., Sekhar LN, Kim LJ. Spontaneous hemorrhage from central nervous system hemangioblastomas. World Neurosurg 2015;83:1180.e13-7. |
| 19. | Deng X, Wang K, Wu L, Yang C, Yang T, Zhao L, et al. Intraspinal hemangioblastomas: Analysis of 92 cases in a single institution: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:260-9. |
| 20. | Ampie L, Choy W, Khanna R, Smith ZA, Dahdaleh NS, Parsa AT, et al. Role of preoperative embolization for intradural spinal hemangioblastomas. J Clin Neurosci 2016;24:83-7. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
[Table 1]
|
